Ex parte OOWAKI - Page 1



                                                       Paper No. 19                   
               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                              Ex parte YUKIHITO OOWAKI                                
                                   ______________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1998-0449                                  
                              Application 08/578,900                                  
                                   _______________                                    
                              HEARD: February 9, 2000                                 
                                   _______________                                    
          Before JERRY SMITH, DIXON and FRAHM, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   
                                                                                     
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 15-28, which                        
          constitute all the claims remaining in the application.                     
          The disclosed invention pertains to a semiconductor                         
          memory device.                                                              
          Representative claim 15 is reproduced as follows:                           
               15.  A semiconductor memory device comprising:                         


                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007