Ex parte KORIYAMA et al. - Page 1

                             THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                 

                               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                 
                                 (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                 
                                        (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                        
                                                                                                Paper No. 23              
                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                           Ex parte HIROSHI KORIYAMA, NORIO TAGAWA, KENJI ITOH,                                           
                                       MISA IWAMOTO, and TAKAHIRO SUZUKI                                                  
                                                  Appeal No. 1998-0453                                                    
                                                Application No. 08/381,306                                                
                                                        ON BRIEF                                                          
              Before THOMAS, BARRETT, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
              DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         

                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       

                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 13 and 16,                
              which are all of the claims pending in this application.                                                    
                     We REVERSE.                                                                                          

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007