Appeal No. 1998-0453 Application No. 08/381,306 with grooves are only at the axial ends. Therefore, we find that the examiner has not set forth a prima facie case of anticipation, and we cannot sustain the rejection of claims 13 and 16. CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 13 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 is reversed. REVERSED JAMES D. THOMAS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JOSEPH L. DIXON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) jld/vsh 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007