Ex parte ZIMMERMANN et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1998-0476                                                        
          Application 08/397,157                                                      


          see the switch to RAM mode at step 41 (thus monitor circuit                 
          resetting is suppressed).  At step 44 the monitor circuit is                
          refreshed.  This refreshing is accomplished via a resetting                 
          subroutine.  This subroutine is shown in Figure 6.  At step                 
          50, the microcomputer is switched back to the ROM mode.  We                 
          note that the ROM mode allows the monitor circuit to be reset,              
          i.e., the signals are not                                                   




          suppressed.  This is the “switching the microcomputer from                  
          time to time” recited in claim 7.  Resetting of the monitor                 
          circuit is accomplished at step 53, the microcomputer is                    
          switched back to the RAM mode at step 54, and (back to Figure               
          5) after refresh step 44, the microcomputer is switched back                
          to ROM at step 47.  At step 48, the microcomputer returns to                
          the main program, step 36 in Figure 4.                                      
                    Thus, we find the claimed invention to have utility,              
          and we will not sustain the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 101                      
          rejection.                                                                  
          Rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112                                             


                                         -5-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007