Ex parte KOIKE et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                       
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was               
          not written for publication in a law journal and is not                      
          binding precedent of the Board.                                              
                                                             Paper No. 20              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                      __________                                       
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                      __________                                       
          Ex parte HIDEKI KOIKE, SATOSHI SHIMADA, AKIRA TOMONO,                        
          KENICHIRO ISHII and TOSHIKI ISO                                              
                                      __________                                       
                                 Appeal No. 1998-0618                                  
                                Application 08/288,194                                 
                                     ___________                                       
                                       ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                       

          Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and HECKER, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                      
          HECKER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                    This is a decision on appeal from the final                        
          rejection of claims 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 14, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24,                 
          26, 28, 29 and 32 through 37, all claims pending in this                     
          application at the time.  Appellants have subsequently                       


                                          -1-1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007