Appeal No. 1998-0618 Application 08/288,194 angular interval aspect. Since the 10E/40E angular interval aspect is recited in all rejected claims, we need not comment on Appellants’ additional arguments. Thus, we will not sustain the Examiner’s rejection of any claims. We have not sustained the rejection of claims 32 through 37 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Accordingly, the Examiner's decision is reversed. REVERSED KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) STUART N. HECKER ) Administrative Patent Judge ) SNH:pgg Elliott I. Pollock -10-10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007