Paper No. 19
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte MASATAKA NAKASUJI,
SHOICHI KAWAI, YOSHIRO KIHARA,
JUNICHI SAITOU and YOUKO NISHIOKA
______________
Appeal No. 1998-0641
Application 08/354,158
_______________
HEARD: APRIL 17, 2000
_______________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's
final rejection of claims 1 and 3 through 24, which constitute
all the claims remaining in the application.
Representative claim 1 is reproduced below:
1. An electronic apparatus for maintaining confidentiality
of
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007