Appeal No. 1998-0641 Application 08/354,158 jewel box 10 having set according to digital dial switches 14 a combination to unlock the lock. In accordance with the operation of the overall device in Figure 3, the wrist watch 1 transfers optically this same encoded information for comparison in the jewel box 10. The RAM 23 in Figure 4 of the system of Figure 3 permits the user to enter not only the respective data items by name, which have an electronic lock associated with them but also, at the same time, a so-called encrypted code associated therewith for each item stored. Functionally, this occurs in accordance with the teaching beginning at column 16, line 5. The examiner appears to have misconstrued this teaching and showing in Karasawa in that the data item JEWEL of Figure 4 has entered associated with it the unlocking code of 0425 to unlock the jewel box 10 of Figure 2, where the same code is depicted there with the key switches 14 associated with the jewel box itself. The numerical value of 0425 does not represent, in the context of Karasawa's teachings, an encrypted, encoded, converted or scrambled representation of the word “jewel.” A similar observation can be made with respect to the other separate items listed in Figure 4 of Karasawa. We recognize that, in accordance with some teachings in different modes of Karasawa, the word 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007