Ex parte LANTTO et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 29              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                               Ex parte SVEN J. LANTTO                                
                                 and MATS O. STILLE                                   
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1998-0644                                  
                               Application 08/637,588                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and HECKER, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
             This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134                   
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 22-26, which                        
          constitute all the claims remaining in the application.                     
          The invention pertains to a method for handling a                           
          request for a new call from a mobile station which is                       

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007