THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 29 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte SVEN J. LANTTO and MATS O. STILLE __________ Appeal No. 1998-0644 Application 08/637,588 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and HECKER, Administrative Patent Judges. JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of claims 22-26, which constitute all the claims remaining in the application. The invention pertains to a method for handling a request for a new call from a mobile station which is 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007