Appeal No. 1998-0644
Application 08/637,588
level of skill in the particular art would have suggested to
one of ordinary skill in the art the obviousness of the
invention as set forth in claims 24 and 25. We reach the
opposite conclusion with respect to claim 26. Accordingly, we
affirm-in-part.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007