Ex parte LANTTO et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-0644                                                        
          Application 08/637,588                                                      


          currently in an active call state.  More particularly, the                  
          invention is directed to reducing the amount of communications              
          required between the mobile station and the central network.                
          Representative claim 22 is reproduced as follows:                           
               22. A signalling method for a radiocommunication                       
          system having a mobile station and a network comprising the                 
          steps of:                                                                   
               establishing an active call between said mobile                        
          station and said network;                                                   
               transmitting a signal from said mobile station to said                 
          network requesting that a new call be established;                          
               detecting, in said network, said established active                    
          call;                                                                       
               interpreting, in said network, said signal as a                        
          request to place on hold said active call; and                              
               establishing said new call.                                            
               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Barnes et al. (Barnes)        4,829,554         May 9, 1989                 
          Pugh et al. (Pugh)            5,414,754         May 9, 1995                 
          (filed July 9, 1992)                                                        
          Claim 24 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                      
          paragraph, for failing to particularly point out and                        
          distinctly claim the invention.  Claims 22 and 23 stand                     
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by the               
          disclosure of Barnes.  Claims 24-26 stand rejected under 35                 
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007