Ex parte KATSURABAYASHI et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-0874                                                        
          Application 08/318,513                                                      






               means for producing a freely set key table that                        
          correlates operation key information representing a function                
          of the specified operation key and further area information                 
          representing the freely set sub-area of the freely set key                  
          area of the coordinate input surface.                                       
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Flurry                        4,633,436          Dec. 30, 1986              
          Day, Jr. et al. (Day)         4,763,356          Aug. 09, 1988              
          Todome                        4,937,762          June 26, 1990              
          Hube et al. (Hube)            5,119,079          June 02, 1992              
          (filed Sep. 17,                                                             
          1990)                                                                       
          Okada                         5,208,683          May  04, 1993              
          (filed July 24,                                                             
          1989)                                                                       
          R. N. Wolfe, “Keyboard for Electronic Tablet or Digitizer,”                 
          IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 3, August                   
          1971, pages 807-808.                                                        
          The following rejections are before us on appeal:                           
          1. Claims 1 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                   
          being unpatentable over the teachings of Todome, Okada and                  
          Hube.        2. Claims 2, 6, 7, 9 and 11 stand rejected under               
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the                              
          teachings of Todome, Okada, Hube and Wolfe.                                 
          3. Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                        


                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007