Appeal No. 1998-0874
Application 08/318,513
being unpatentable over the teachings of Todome, Okada, Hube
and Flurry.
4. Claim 8 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over the teachings of Todome, Okada, Hube, Wolfe
and Flurry.
5. Claims 12, 14, 20, 21, 23 and 29 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of
Day and Hube.
6. Claims 13, 15-19, 22 and 24-28 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of
Day, Hube and Wolfe.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner and the
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007