Ex parte ROSSLER et al. - Page 1

                                 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                        

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law               
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                

                                                                                             Paper No. 15                            

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                          


                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                           
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                               

                                                   Ex parte GEORG ROSSLER                                                            
                                                     and DETLEF STRUNK                                                               

                                                      Appeal No. 1998-1024                                                           
                                                     Application 08/511,703                                                          

                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                 

               Before STAAB, NASE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                            

               STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                   

                                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              

                       This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 10, which                

               are all of the claims remaining in the application.                                                                   

                       Appellants’ invention relates to a drive for a multi-color printing press.  The printing press                

               includes a plurality of printing units (2) that are interconnected through the intermediary of a gear train.          


Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007