Ex parte ROSSLER et al. - Page 9




               Appeal No. 1998-1024                                                                                                    
               Application 08/511,703                                                                                                  


                                                           CONCLUSION                                                                  

                       The examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 10 under 35 U.S.C.§ 112, first paragraph, is                       

               reversed.  The examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed.                           

                       Since at least one of the examiner’s rejections of each of the appealed claims has been                         

               affirmed, the decision of the examiner finally rejecting claims 1-10 is affirmed.                                       

                       No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be                           

               extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).                                                                                       

                                                            AFFIRMED                                                                   




                                                                                       )                                               
                                       LAWRENCE J. STAAB                               )                                               
                                       Administrative Patent Judge                         )                                           
                                                                                       )                                               
                                                                                       )                                               
                                                                                       ) BOARD OF PATENT                               
                                       JEFFREY V. NASE                                 )                                               
                                       Administrative Patent Judge                         )   APPEALS AND                             
                                                                                       )                                               
                                                                                       ) INTERFERENCES                                 
                                                                                       )                                               
                                       JENNIFER D. BAHR                )                                                               
                                       Administrative Patent Judge                         )                                           




                                                                  9                                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007