Appeal No. 1998-1357
Application No. 08/348,744
(2) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 93, 107,
108, 111, 112, 119, 127, 133 and 134 under U.S.C. § 102(b) as
being clearly anticipated by Lindquist is reversed;
(3) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 93, 108,
111, and 127 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by
Searle is affirmed;
(4) the decision of the examiner to reject claim 108 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being clearly anticipated by Kettlewell
is affirmed;
(5) the decision of the examiner to reject claim 108 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being clearly anticipated Johnston is
reversed;
(6) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 109,
110, 114, 118, 122, 126, 132, 138 and 139 under 35 U.S.C. §
103(a) as being unpatentable over Lindquist is reversed;
(7) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 110,
39
Page: Previous 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007