Appeal No. 1998-1357 Application No. 08/348,744 118, and 132 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Searle is affirmed; (8) the decision of the examiner to reject claim 139 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Searle is reversed; (9) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 110, 118 and 132 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kettlewell is affirmed; (10) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 110, 118 and 132 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Johnston is reversed; (11) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 89, 92, 93, 107 through 112, 114, 115, 118, 119, 122, 123, 126 through 128, 130, 132 through 135 and 138 through 141 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lindquist in view of Kettlewell, Pritchard, Setzekorn and Mapes is reversed; 40Page: Previous 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007