Ex parte HALL et al. - Page 40




          Appeal No. 1998-1357                                                        
          Application No. 08/348,744                                                  


          118, and 132 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable                 
          over Searle is affirmed;                                                    


               (8) the decision of the examiner to reject claim 139 under             
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Searle is                     
          reversed;                                                                   


               (9) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 110, 118             
          and 132 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                 
          Kettlewell is affirmed;                                                     


               (10) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 110,                
          118 and 132 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over             
          Johnston is reversed;                                                       


               (11) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 89, 92,             
          93, 107 through 112, 114, 115, 118, 119, 122, 123, 126 through              
          128, 130, 132 through 135 and 138 through 141 under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lindquist in view of                    
          Kettlewell, Pritchard, Setzekorn and Mapes is reversed;                     


                                          40                                          





Page:  Previous  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007