Ex parte HALL et al. - Page 41




          Appeal No. 1998-1357                                                        
          Application No. 08/348,744                                                  


               (12) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 123,                
          135, 137 and 140 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable             
          over Lindquist in view of Kettlewell is reversed;                           
               (13) the decision of the examiner to reject claim 137                  
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lindquist               
          in view of Johnston is reversed;                                            


               (14) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 152 and             
          154 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                     
          Lindquist in view of Searle is reversed; and finally,                       


               (15) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 109,                
          115, 128, 130 and 141 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                     
          unpatentable over Kettlewell in view of Lindquist is affirmed.              












                                          41                                          





Page:  Previous  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007