Appeal No. 1998-1418
Application 08/313,249
Claims 4 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over Anthony, Bendig and Takahashi as
applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Berger ‘067
or Berger ‘708.
Claims 10, 11, 28 and 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Anthony, Bendig and Takahashi
as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Maehara and
Sugimoto.
Claims 14, 15, 32 and 334 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Anthony, Bendig and
Takahashi as applied to claims 1 and 28 above, and further in
view of Ross.
Claims 21, 38, 39 and 40 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Anthony, Bendig and Takahashi
4 Claims 32 and 33 depend from claim 28. Since the rejec-
tion of claim 28 includes the references to Anthony, Bendig,
Takahashi, Maehara and Sugimoto, we understand the rejection of
claims 32 and 33 to also include the references to Maehara and
Sugimoto. Therefore, we understand the rejection of claims 32
and 33 to be based on Anthony, Bendig, Takahashi, Maehara and
Sugimoto as applied to claim 28 above, and further in view of
Ross.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007