Appeal No. 1998-1418 Application 08/313,249 Bendig and Takahashi as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Dobilas, Junghans, Sukhin and Hughes, claim 38 specifically claims the proximity of the vessel side wall to the bottom of the pump shaft. Claim 38 does not claim the specifics of the resilient biasing member of claim 1, nor the mesh plate of claim 28. We will now discuss the prior art further relied upon by the examiner. Dobilas discloses a device for vaccinating and providing therapy to animals which includes an atomizer 13 and a liquid vessel 3. The upper ends of the liquid supply tubes 23 are attached to the atomizer and the lower ends extend into the liquid vessel 3. The single figure in this reference shows the tubes 23 and their close proximity to the walls and bottom of liquid vessel 3. Junghans discloses an inhalation device that atomizes the medicant housed inside vessel 4. Figure 1 shows a tube extending into the vessel and the close proximity of the tube to the walls and bottom of the vessel. Sukhin discloses an atomizer used in the medical field. The single figure shows supply tubes 3 and 11 and their close 17Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007