THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SOICHI KATO and TAKASHI SUGITA
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-1425
Application 08/437,808
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
and 2, all the claims in the application.
The claims on appeal are drawn to a method of
manufacturing flat tubes for a tube-stacking heat exchanger,
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007