The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 13 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte EDWINA F. LOWRY and PAUL T. SPIVEY ____________ Appeal No. 1998-1440 Application No. 08/368,452 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, BARRETT, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the rejection of claims 4-16. We affirm-in-part. BACKGROUND The invention at issue in this appeal relates to manufacturing an ink jet print cartridge. Such a cartridge comprises an ink reservoir in communication with an ink channel and a nozzle plate. The nozzle plate includes holesPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007