The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TSUEN-HSI LIU, DEMETRI PSALTIS,
FAI H. MOK, and GAN ZHOU
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1472
Application No. 08/427,721
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the rejection of claims 1-5, 34, 35, 96-99, 101, 106-110,
114-116, 142-144, 151-153, 164-166, 168, 171 and 174-178. We
affirm-in-part.
BACKGROUND
The invention at issue in this appeal relates to optical
disk storage. Typically, 650 MB of data can be stored on a
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007