Appeal No. 1998-1472 Page 4
Application No. 08/427,721
Hugle 5,322,747 June 21,
1994.
Claims 1-3, 34, 35, 142, 143, 151, 152, 166, 168, and 178
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by
Takeda. Claims 1-3, 5, 34, 35, 96-98, 101, 106-108, 110, 114,
116, 142, 143, 151, 152, 164-166, 168, 171, 174-176, and 178
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over
Bjorklund in view of Takeda. Claims 4, 144, 153, and 177
stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Bjorklund in view of Takeda
further in view of Murakami. Claims 99, 109, and 115 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Bjorklund in
view of Takeda further in view of Hugle. Rather than repeat
the arguments of the appellants or examiner in toto, we refer
the reader to the briefs and answer for the respective details
thereof.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we considered
the subject matter on appeal and the rejection advanced by
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007