Ex parte HATTORI et al. - Page 16




          Appeal No. 1998-1655                                      Page 16           
          Application No. 08/367,766                                                  


          the first main surface of the cartridge."  (Examiner's Answer               
          at 8.)                                                                      


               “‘[T]he main purpose of the examination, to which every                
          application is subjected, is to try to make sure that what                  
          each claim defines is patentable.  [T]he name of the game is                
          the claim ....’”  In re Hiniker Co., 150 F.3d 1362, 1369,                   
          47 USPQ2d 1523, 1529 (Fed. Cir. 1998) (quoting Giles S. Rich,               
          The Extent of the Protection and Interpretation of                          
          Claims--American Perspectives, 21 Int'l Rev. Indus. Prop. &                 
          Copyright L. 497, 499, 501 (1990)). Claim 4 specifies in                    
          pertinent part the following limitations: "said support means               
          includes four reference surfaces for contacting said first                  
          main surface of said cartridge."  Giving the claim its                      
          broadest reasonable interpretation, the limitations recite at               
          least four surfaces for contacting the first main surface of                
          the disk cartridge.                                                         


               Figures 3 and 26 of Yamada show that the tip of each of                
          the positioning pins 10 and 10' features at least three                     
          surfaces.  More specifically, the Figures depict a flat                     







Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007