Ex parte HATTORI et al. - Page 17




          Appeal No. 1998-1655                                      Page 17           
          Application No. 08/367,766                                                  


          surface and two angular surfaces for each tip.  Because Yamada              
          discloses at least three surfaces for each of the two                       
          positioning pins, we are persuaded that reference teaches the               
          limitations of "said support means includes four reference                  
          surfaces for contacting said first main surface of said                     
          cartridge."  Therefore, we affirm the rejection of claim 4 as               
          anticipated by Yamada.  Because Yamada anticipates the                      
          invention of claim 4, the claim is ipso facto obvious over the              
          reference.  Therefore, we affirm the rejection of claim 4 as                
          obvious over Yamada.  We next address claims 8-10, 12-19, 21,               
          22, and 26-29.                                                              
























Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007