Appeal No. 1998-1657 Page 18
Application No. 08/674,282
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the provisional rejections of claims 5-7,
20-26, and 28-39 under the doctrine of obviousness-type double
patenting as being unpatentable over claims 13-46 of the '328
Application and over claims 8, 9, and 14-50 of the '183
Application are reversed. The rejection of claims 5-7, 20-26,
and 28-39 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Young in view
of Toshiba is also reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LANCE LEONARD BARRY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007