Ex parte INOUE - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1998-1796                                                        
          Application No. 08/408,154                                                  


          motor is provided which operates to suppress the regenerative               
          energy supplied to a battery.  In Kamaike, as illustrated in                
          Figure 3 and described beginning at column 3, line 56, the                  
          control circuitry 14 operates to control the amount of power                
          supplied to battery 4 in order to equalize the charging and                 
          discharging rate.  We find no control of motor 6, however,                  
          which operates to suppress the amount of regenerative energy                
          supplied to battery 4 as claimed.                                           
               Similarly, in Sun, we find no suppression of supplied                  
          regenerative energy from motor/generator 16 to battery 22.                  
          While the motor/generator 16 operates to rapidly charge and                 
          discharge the SMES energy storage device 20, which in turn                  
          provides a slow charge and discharge to battery 22, this                    
          battery charge from SMES 20 occurs without limit (Sun, column               
          8, lines 25-28).  Further, although Sun suggests a battery                  
          charge limit (column 8,                                                     
          line 22-24), this passage refers to the operation of charger                
          generator 34 which is controlled by gasoline engine 10 and not              
          the battery powered motor generator 16.                                     




                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007