Appeal No. 1998-1796
Application No. 08/408,154
In view of the above discussion, it is our view that,
since all of the limitations of the appealed claims are not
taught or suggested by the prior art, the Examiner has not
established a prima facie case of obviousness. Accordingly,
the 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 rejection of independent claims 1 and 2, as well as
claims 3-21 dependent thereon, cannot be sustained.
Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-21
is reversed.
REVERSED
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LANCE LEONARD BARRY )
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007