Appeal No. 1998-1815 Page 16
Application No. 08/684,328
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the provisional rejections of claims 30-40
and 45-46 under the doctrine of obviousness-type double
patenting as unpatentable over claims 5-7,20-26, and 28-39 of
the '282 Application and of claims 43 and 44 under the
doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as unpatentable
over claims 8, 9, and 14-50 of the '183 Application are
reversed. The rejection of claims 45 and 46 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as obvious over Young in view of Toshiba is also
reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LANCE LEONARD BARRY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007