Appeal No. 1998-1993
Application 08/320,729
thickness of about 1000 D would inherently have an ON/OFF
ratio similar to the ratio of 10 as disclosed by Holmberg7
[answer, page 9].
Appellants argue that Holmberg does not remedy the
deficiencies in the prior art as discussed above with respect
to claim 44. We agree. Since Holmberg does not overcome the
deficiencies in the basic combination of references discussed
above, we also do not sustain the rejection of claims 50 and
53 based on the applied prior art.
In summary, we have not sustained any of the examiner’s
16
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007