THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte A. STEVEN PATTERSON
____________
Appeal No. 1998-2001
Application No. 08/408,688
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 31-49, which constitute all of the1
1An amendment to claim 48 was entered after the final
rejection, as a result of which the examiner withdrew
rejections of claims 48 and 49 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph, and 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007