Ex parte PATTERSON - Page 6




          Appeal No. 1998-2001                                                        
          Application No. 08/408,688                                                  


               Curtis also is directed to treating water by magnetic                  
          means.  Like the appellant, Curtis uses a plurality of magnets              
          arranged in a particular relationship with one another, with a              
          spacer, and with a mounting platform.  Of critical importance               
          to the issue of the patentability of the appellant’s claims,                
          however, is the requirement in the Curtis system that the                   
          magnet unit "comprises at least four magnets" (Abstract;                    
          column 2, line 63).  Although it may contain more than four                 
          magnets (column 6, lines 49-50), it is clear that it cannot                 
          contain fewer than four.                                                    
               In the statement of the invention in the appellant’s                   
          apparatus claims 31 and 35 and method claim 48 the magnetic                 
          treatment apparatus is recited as "consisting of" an                        
          arrangement of three magnets in turn "consisting of" first,                 
          second and third                                                            











                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007