The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WINSTON A. ANDREWS, GLORIA R. DUMLAO and TERRY R. KNAPP ____________ Appeal No. 1998-2806 Application No. 08/459,721 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before METZ, FRANKFORT, and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 18 through 26, which are all of the claims remaining in the application. Claims 1 through 17 and 27 through 36 have been canceled. Appellants' invention relates generally to surgical implants or prostheses (e.g., breast implants), and more particularly to 1) a filler material for implants comprising aPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007