Ex parte ANDREWS et al. - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1998-2806                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/459,721                                                                                                             


                 representative of the subject matter before us on appeal and a                                                                         
                 copy of that claim can be found in Appendix A of appellants’                                                                           
                 brief.                                                                                                                                 


                 The sole prior art reference of record relied upon by the                                                                              
                 examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                                                                                          
                 Destouet et al. (Destouet)                            4,995,882                                    Feb. 26,                            
                 1991                                                                                                                                   


                 Claims 18 through 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                                                                                  
                 102(b) as being clearly anticipated by an admission in                                                                                 
                 appellants’  specification (page 6, lines 4-20).                                                                                       


                 Claims 21 through 26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                                                                              
                 as being unpatentable over the admission in appellants’                                                                                
                 specification (page 6, lines 4-20) in view of Destouet.1                                                                               





                          1On page 6 of the examiner’s answer, the examiner has                                                                         
                 indicated withdrawal of the rejection of claims 21 and 24                                                                              
                 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, that was part of the                                                                          
                 final rejection (Paper No. 11).                                                                                                        
                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007