Ex parte ANDREWS et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 1998-2806                                                        
          Application No. 08/459,721                                                  


          6, lines 4 through 20 of the specification, it is our view                  
          that the examiner has misconstrued the extent of appellants’                
          admission and instead impermissibly relied upon appellants’                 
          own teachings regarding the invention to                                    






























                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007