Ex parte PEPPEL - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-2848                                                        
          Application 08/398,862                                                      

                    entering a multiroom virtual environment where each               
               room in said environment requires a specific set of ETCs               
               to complete an ETC collection, each ETC corresponding to               
               a disassociated computer code segment and having an                    
               electronic format that supports card scarcity and card                 
               authenticity;                                                          
                    finding a missing ETC;                                            
                    completing said set; and                                          
                    reward when said set is completed.                                


               21.  A method for implementing a trading card metaphor,                
               comprising the steps of:                                               
                    a dissociating a computer program, consisting of a                
               plurality of electronic trading cards (ETCs), each ETC                 
               corresponding to a disassociated computer code segment                 
               and having an electronic format that supports card                     
               scarcity and card authenticity.                                        

               The Examiner relies on the following prior art reference:              
               Smith et al. (Smith)     5,533,124           July 2, 1996              
          (filed December 7, 1994)                                                    
               Claims 1-39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as being              
          directed to nonstatutory subject matter.                                    
               Claims 1-39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as                 
          being anticipated by Smith.                                                 
               We refer to the Office Action (Paper No. 10) entered                   
          May 21, 1997, and the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 17) (pages               

                                        - 3 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007