Ex parte PEPPEL - Page 11




          Appeal No. 1998-2848                                                        
          Application 08/398,862                                                      

          Limitations will not be read into the claims from the                       
          specification to make the claimed subject matter statutory.                 
          Moreover, it is not clear what limitations Appellant would                  
          have read in from the specification.                                        
               Appellant argues (Br16-17):                                            
               From the above it is clear that it is not a data                       
               structure per se or a computer program per se (so-called               
               Functional Descriptive Material) which is claimed.  See                
               M.P.E.P. 2106 B 1.(a):  "Data Structures [sic] not                     
               claimed as embodied in computer-readable media are                     
               descriptive material per se and are not statutory because              
               they are neither physical 'things' nor statutory                       
               processes."  The present claims are clearly different and              
               directed to different subject matter than was claimed in               
               Warmerdam, 33 F.3d, 1361, 31 USPQ2d, 1760 [cited in                    
               footnote 30 in the Guidelines to the quotation] where a                
               claim to a data structure per se was held nonstatutory.                
               While the invention may be worked using a series of steps              
               to be performed on a computer (e.g. in case of on-line                 
               ETCs), the system according to the invention may as well               
               be implemented by using physical trading cards containing              
               the particular ETC format (i.e. ETCs on physical media).               
               But even in the former case, the invention does not                    
               merely manipulate an abstract idea or solve a purely                   
               mathematical problem without any limitation to a                       
               practical application.  With the present invention,                    
               electronic trading cards must be produced or created,                  
               distributed or traded, then collected, and offer some                  
               kind of reward when a series of ETCs has been completed.               
               Electronic trading cards can be viewed, either on a                    
               computer screen or on some other physical media (see                   
               order, In re Gary M. Beauregard, et al., Case                          
               No. 95-1054, Fed. Cir., 12 May 1995) ("Connector [sic ?]               
               Programs Embodied in a Tangible Medium ...are patentable               
               subject matter under 35 USC § 101...".                                 


                                       - 11 -                                         





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007