THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________________ Ex parte BARRY M. MILES, WILLIAM B. MULLEN, III, and GLENN E. GOLD __________________ Appeal No. 1998-3048 Application 08/502,9931 ________________ ON BRIEF ________________ Before SCHAFER, LEE and MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges. LEE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of appellants’ claims 1-5. The real party in interest is Motorola, Inc. References relied on by the Examiner Shen Patent No. 5,384,689 January 24, 1995 The Rejections on Appeal 1 Application for patent filed July 17, 1995.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007