Ex parte LONG et al. - Page 2




               Appeal No. 98-3404                                                                                                      
               Application 08/600,813                                                                                                  


               including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.                                          



                       Appellants’ invention relates to a handle attachment for use on a reel-type fishing rod.  A first               

               embodiment of the handle attachment, referred to by appellants as the preferred embodiment, is seen in                  

               Figure 1 of the drawings, while a second embodiment of the handle attachment is seen in Figure 2.  A                    

               copy of claims 1, 11, 12 and 13 on appeal, as reproduced from appellants’ Appendix to the brief, is                     

               attached to this decision.                                                                                              



                       The sole prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed                    

               claims is:                                                                                                              

               Bowen                                   2,158,104               May 16, 1939                                            



                       Claims 1 through 3, 5 through 7, 9 and 11 through 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                             

               § 102(b) as being anticipated by Bowen.                                                                                 



                       Claims 11 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as containing subject                   

               matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one                        

               skilled in the relevant art that the inventors, at the time the application was filed, had possession of the            


                                                                  2                                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007