Ex parte LONG et al. - Page 9




               Appeal No. 98-3404                                                                                                  
               Application 08/600,813                                                                                              


               with appellants' position on this issue, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 11 and 13           

               under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.                                                                             



                       In summary, both the examiner's rejection of claims 11 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                  

               paragraph, and the rejection of claims 1 through 3, 5 through 7, 9 and 11 through 13 under 35 U.S.C.                

               § 102(b) have been reversed.  A new rejection of claims 1 through 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                  

               paragraph, has been added pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.196(b).                                                         



                       The decision of the examiner is reversed.                                                                   



                       This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 C.F.R.                                      

               § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct.                  

               10, 1997), 1203 Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).  37 C.F.R.                              

               § 1.196(b) provides that, “A new ground of rejection shall not be considered final for purposes of                  

               judicial review.”                                                                                                   

                       37 C.F.R.  § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellants, WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM                             

               THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the following two options with respect to the                        




                                                                9                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007