THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 27 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RANDALL C. ARNOLD ____________ Appeal No. 1999-0032 Application No. 08/525,407 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting claims 1-3, 11-17, 20 and 21. Claim 19 has been canceled, claims 18 and 22-27 have been allowed, and claims 4-10 have been indicated as containing allowable subject matter.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007