Appeal No. 1999-0032 Page 9
Application No. 08/525,407
reconstruction to pick and choose among isolated
disclosures in the prior art to deprecate the claimed
invention" (citations omitted).
A prima facie case of obviousness therefore has not been
established with regard to the subject matter of claim 1, and
we cannot sustain the rejection of claim 1 or, it follows, of
claims 2, 3 and 11-17, which depend therefrom.
SUMMARY
Neither rejection is sustained.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOHN F. GONZALES )
Administrative Patent Judge )
NEA/jlb
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007