Ex parte WILKEY - Page 4




                 Appeal No. 1999-0114                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/656,286                                                                                                             

                 and further in view of Plante; and                                                                                                     
                          (c) claim 15, unpatentable over Weiss in view of Cosmo,                                                                       
                 and further in view of Akerstrom.                                                                                                      
                          Weiss, the examiner’s primary reference, pertains to an                                                                       
                 apparatus for combining together several individual items, for                                                                         
                 example, milk cartons, into a unitary package 2, wherein the                                                                           
                 individual items are secured together by an encircling band                                                                            
                 10.  In rejecting independent claim 11 as being unpatentable                                                                           
                 over Weiss in view of Cosmo, the examiner considers that the                                                                           
                 manner in which the apparatus of Weiss applies the bands to                                                                            
                 the individual items corresponds to the claimed method, except                                                                         
                 that Weiss does not provide contact adhesive to bond the edges                                                                         
                 of the wrapper.   According to the examiner, it would have1                                                                                                           
                 been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of                                                                            
                 Cosmo to substitute contact adhesive for the adhesive 14, 15                                                                           
                 of Weiss “to provide a more secure and removable package”                                                                              
                 (answer, page 3).  Implicit in the rejection is the examiner’s                                                                         
                 position that the modified Weiss method would correspond to                                                                            


                          1The examiner also considers that Weiss does not disclose                                                                     
                 heat shrinking the wrapper about the products, or cutting the                                                                          
                 wrapper from a roll; however, independent claim 11 does not                                                                            
                 require either of these steps.                                                                                                         
                                                                           4                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007