Appeal No. 1999-0114
Application No. 08/656,286
As to the rejection of claim 13 as being unpatentable
further in view of Plante, and the rejection of claim 15 as
being unpatentable further in view of Akerstrom, we have
carefully reviewed the Plante and Akerstrom references
additionally relied upon by the examiner but find nothing
therein that makes up for the deficiencies of Weiss and Cosmo
discussed supra. Therefore, the examiner’s rejections of
claims 13 and 15 also cannot be sustained.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
Harrison E. McCandlish, Senior )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
Lawrence J. Staab ) BOARD OF
PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
John F. Gonzales )
Administrative Patent Judge )
LJS:tdl
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007