Appeal No. 1999-0172 Application 08/334,733 SUMMARY The decision of the examiner: a) to reject claims 1 through 3, 5 through 11 and 27 through 31 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Mansell is affirmed with respect to claims 1 through 3 and 5 through 9, and reversed with respect to claims 10, 11 and 27 through 31; b) to reject claims 1 through 3 and 5 through 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Bickley is reversed; c) to reject claims 1 through 3 and 5 through 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Rudnicki in view of Mansell or Bickley is affirmed; d) to reject claims 1 through 3 and 5 through 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Burns in view of Mansell or Bickley is affirmed; e) to reject claims 1 through 3 and 5 through 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Welles in view of Mansell or Bickley is affirmed; and 20Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007