Appeal No. 1999-0226 Page 9
Application No. 08/447,217
The obviousness rejections utilizing Tautvydas
We will not sustain the rejection of claims 1 to 20 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 utilizing Tautvydas as the primary reference.
As set forth above, the claimed "aqueous solution of
polyethylene glycol" is not disclosed by Tautvydas. We have
reviewed the references to Scopelianos, Van Aken Redinger and
Cohen but find nothing therein which would have rendered it
obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having
ordinary skill in the art to have modified Tautvydas to arrive
at the claimed invention. Accordingly, we cannot sustain the
examiner's rejection of appealed claims 1 to 20 under 35
U.S.C.
§ 103 utilizing Tautvydas as the primary reference.
The obviousness rejections utilizing Peterson
We will not sustain the rejection of claims 1, 9 and 16
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 utilizing Peterson as the primary
reference.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007