Ex parte KALAMARAS - Page 1




                           THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                       

            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
            journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                            

                                                                             Paper No. 31                     


                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                         

                                               _____________                                                  

                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                           
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                               _____________                                                  

            Ex parte MICHAEL P. KALAMARAS                                                                     
                                           _____________________                                              

                                             Appeal No. 1999-0391                                             
                                            Application 08/225,2291                                           
                                               ______________                                                 

                                                  ON BRIEF                                                    
                                              _______________                                                 

            Before BARRETT, DIXON and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                    

            FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               


                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 

                   Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 6, 22, and

            26.  Claims 5, 8 to 19, and 25 stand withdrawn as being drawn to a non-elected invention.  Claims 2 to

            4, 7, 20, 21, 23, and 24 stand allowed.                                                           


                   1Application for patent filed April 8, 1994.                                               
                                                      1                                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007