Ex parte KALAMARAS - Page 3




               Appeal No. 1999-0391                                                                                                  
               Application 08/225,229                                                                                                


               the upper compartment and the lower compartment;                                                                      


                       (b) molding a base having a circular base platform and a cylindrical base wall that will increase             
               the size of the lower compartment when the base is connected to the housing;                                          

                       (c) inserting means for attracting attention into the lower compartment of the beverage vessel;               
               and                                                                                                                   

                       (d) sealing the lower compartment by connecting the base to the housing by connecting a lower                 
               edge of the cylindrical housing wall to an upper edge of the cylindrical base wall.                                   

                       The following references are relied on by the examiner:                                                       

               Ditto et al. (Ditto)           4,344,113                                      Aug. 10, 1982                           
               Runge                          4,390,928                                      Jun.  28, 1983                          
               Von Kohorn                     4,616,304                                     Oct.    7, 1986                         

                       Claims 1 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Ditto.                         

                       Claims 22 and 26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the                       

               examiner relies upon Runge and Von Kohorn.                                                                            

                       Rather than repeat the positions of appellant and the examiner, reference is made to the Briefs               

               and the Answer for the respective details thereof.2                                                                   

                                                             OPINION                                                                 

                       In reaching our conclusion on the issues raised in this appeal, we have carefully considered                  



                       2We note that the Reply Brief of June 10, 1997, has been entered and considered by the examiner as per the    
               letter from the examiner of February 25, 1999.  We also note that the Information Disclosure Statement of June 26,    
               1996, has not been considered as per the letter from the examiner of October 10, 1996.                                
                                                                 3                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007