THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID S. BREED, WILLIAM T. SANDERS
and RICHARD M. DOWNS, JR.
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0929
Application No. 08/514,986
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
This is in response to appellants' request for rehearing
of our decision mailed March 23, 2000, wherein, among other
determinations, we affirmed the examiner's rejection of claim
17 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Matsui
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007